Accenture vs Applied Materials stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Accenture is cheaper for its profits. Applied Materials is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Accenture | Applied Materials | |
|---|---|---|
| $148 billion | $294 billion | |
| 11.3% | 24.7% | |
| +8.0% | +10.5% | |
| 17.7× | 42.0× | |
| 0.0 years | Net cash | |
| 21.6% | 28.1% | |
| 3.5% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Accenture vs Arista Networks · Accenture vs Broadcom · Accenture vs Cadence Design Systems · Accenture vs Fortinet · Applied Materials vs Adobe · Applied Materials vs Analog Devices · Applied Materials vs AMD · Applied Materials vs Arista Networks

