Which is more profitable, Analog Devices or Applied Materials?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Analog Devices or Applied Materials?

Analog Devices grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Analog Devices or Applied Materials?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Analog Devices or Applied Materials?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Analog DevicesADIvs

Applied MaterialsAMAT

Analog Devices vs Applied Materials stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Analog Devices grows faster. Applied Materials is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Analog Devices	Applied Materials
	$193 billion	$294 billion
	20.6%	24.7%
	+14.5%	+10.5%
	85.1×	42.0×
	1.2 years	Net cash
	5.8%	28.1%
	1.0%	0.4%

Open Analog Devices Open Applied Materials

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Analog Devices vs Arista Networks · Analog Devices vs Broadcom · Analog Devices vs Cadence Design Systems · Analog Devices vs Fortinet · Applied Materials vs AMD · Applied Materials vs Arista Networks · Applied Materials vs Amphenol · Applied Materials vs Arm Holdings