Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Arm Holdings?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Arm Holdings?

Arm Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Arm Holdings?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Arm Holdings?

Arm Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

Arm HoldingsARM

Applied Materials vs Arm Holdings stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Arm Holdings grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Arm Holdings
	$294 billion	$204 billion
	24.7%	18.4%
	+10.5%	+22.5%
	42.0×	225.5×
	Net cash	Net cash
	28.1%	8.4%
	0.4%	–

Open Applied Materials Open Arm Holdings

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs ASML · Applied Materials vs ASE Technology · Applied Materials vs Broadcom · Applied Materials vs Cadence Design Systems · Arm Holdings vs Arista Networks · Arm Holdings vs Broadcom · Arm Holdings vs Cadence Design Systems · Arm Holdings vs Fortinet