Which is more profitable, Arm Holdings or Cadence Design Systems?

Cadence Design Systems keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Arm Holdings or Cadence Design Systems?

Arm Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Arm Holdings or Cadence Design Systems?

Cadence Design Systems costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Arm Holdings or Cadence Design Systems?

Arm Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Arm HoldingsARMvs

Cadence Design SystemsCDNS

Arm Holdings vs Cadence Design Systems stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Arm Holdings grows faster and has less debt. Cadence Design Systems is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Arm Holdings	Cadence Design Systems
	$204 billion	$88.6 billion
	18.4%	20.9%
	+22.5%	+14.6%
	225.5×	79.9×
	Net cash	Net cash
	8.4%	16.4%
	–	–

Open Arm Holdings Open Cadence Design Systems

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Arm Holdings vs Fortinet · Arm Holdings vs KLA · Arm Holdings vs Lam Research · Arm Holdings vs Microsoft · Cadence Design Systems vs ASML · Cadence Design Systems vs ASE Technology · Cadence Design Systems vs Broadcom · Cadence Design Systems vs Salesforce