Which is more profitable, Arm Holdings or KLA?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Arm Holdings or KLA?

Arm Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Arm Holdings or KLA?

KLA costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Arm Holdings or KLA?

Arm Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Arm HoldingsARMvs

KLAKLAC

Arm Holdings vs KLA stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Arm Holdings grows faster and has less debt. KLA is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Arm Holdings	KLA
	$204 billion	$198 billion
	18.4%	35.6%
	+22.5%	+14.4%
	225.5×	41.1×
	Net cash	0.7 years
	8.4%	38.2%
	–	0.4%

Open Arm Holdings Open KLA

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Arm Holdings vs Lam Research · Arm Holdings vs Microsoft · Arm Holdings vs Nvidia · Arm Holdings vs Oracle · KLA vs ASML · KLA vs ASE Technology · KLA vs Broadcom · KLA vs Cadence Design Systems