ASML vs KLA stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ASML grows faster and has less debt. KLA is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| ASML | KLA | |
|---|---|---|
| $576 billion | $198 billion | |
| 29.4% | 35.6% | |
| +15.6% | +14.4% | |
| 54.4× | 41.1× | |
| Net cash | 0.7 years | |
| 38.9% | 38.2% | |
| 0.5% | 0.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ASML vs Lam Research · ASML vs Microsoft · ASML vs Nvidia · ASML vs SAP · KLA vs ASE Technology · KLA vs Broadcom · KLA vs Cadence Design Systems · KLA vs Coherent

