ASML vs Lam Research stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ASML grows faster and has less debt. Lam Research is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| ASML | Lam Research | |
|---|---|---|
| $576 billion | $282 billion | |
| 29.4% | 31.3% | |
| +15.6% | +9.7% | |
| 54.4× | 38.8× | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 38.9% | 42.1% | |
| 0.5% | 0.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ASML vs Microsoft · ASML vs Nvidia · ASML vs SAP · ASML vs Sandisk · Lam Research vs ASE Technology · Lam Research vs Broadcom · Lam Research vs Cadence Design Systems · Lam Research vs Salesforce

