Which is more profitable, ASML or Sandisk?

Sandisk keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, ASML or Sandisk?

Sandisk grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, ASML or Sandisk?

Sandisk costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, ASML or Sandisk?

ASML would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

ASMLASMLvs

SandiskSNDK

ASML vs Sandisk stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

ASML has less debt. Sandisk is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	ASML	Sandisk
	$576 billion	$126 billion
	29.4%	56.5%
	+15.6%	+49.3%
	54.4×	11.0×
	Net cash	Net cash
	38.9%	66.6%
	0.5%	–

Open ASML Open Sandisk

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: ASML vs TSMC · ASML vs Apple · ASML vs Adobe · ASML vs Applied Materials · Sandisk vs Broadcom · Sandisk vs Cadence Design Systems · Sandisk vs Fortinet · Sandisk vs KLA