Which is more profitable, Adobe or ASML?

Adobe keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Adobe or ASML?

ASML grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Adobe or ASML?

Adobe costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Adobe or ASML?

ASML would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AdobeADBEvs

ASMLASML

Adobe vs ASML stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Adobe is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. ASML grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Adobe	ASML
	$94.6 billion	$576 billion
	30.0%	29.4%
	+13.1%	+15.6%
	13.3×	54.4×
	0.1 years	Net cash
	39.9%	38.9%
	–	0.5%

Open Adobe Open ASML

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Adobe vs ASE Technology · Adobe vs Broadcom · Adobe vs Cadence Design Systems · Adobe vs Salesforce · ASML vs Applied Materials · ASML vs Arista Networks · ASML vs Broadcom · ASML vs Cadence Design Systems