Which is more profitable, Adobe or ASE Technology?

Adobe keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Adobe or ASE Technology?

Adobe grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Adobe or ASE Technology?

Adobe costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Adobe or ASE Technology?

Adobe would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AdobeADBEvs

ASE TechnologyASX

Adobe vs ASE Technology stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Adobe is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Adobe	ASE Technology
	$94.6 billion	$78.5 billion
	30.0%	6.2%
	+13.1%	−1.3%
	13.3×	64.5×
	0.1 years	1.4 years
	39.9%	7.9%
	–	0.9%

Open Adobe Open ASE Technology

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Adobe vs Broadcom · Adobe vs Cadence Design Systems · Adobe vs Salesforce · Adobe vs Cisco · ASE Technology vs Applied Materials · ASE Technology vs Arista Networks · ASE Technology vs Cadence Design Systems · ASE Technology vs Fortinet