ASE Technology vs Cadence Design Systems stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ASE Technology is cheaper for its profits. Cadence Design Systems is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| ASE Technology | Cadence Design Systems | |
|---|---|---|
| $78.5 billion | $88.6 billion | |
| 6.2% | 20.9% | |
| −1.3% | +14.6% | |
| 64.5× | 79.9× | |
| 1.4 years | Net cash | |
| 7.9% | 16.4% | |
| 0.9% | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ASE Technology vs Fortinet · ASE Technology vs KLA · ASE Technology vs Lam Research · ASE Technology vs Adobe · Cadence Design Systems vs Broadcom · Cadence Design Systems vs Salesforce · Cadence Design Systems vs Cisco · Cadence Design Systems vs Datadog

