Which is more profitable, ASE Technology or KLA?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, ASE Technology or KLA?

KLA grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, ASE Technology or KLA?

KLA costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, ASE Technology or KLA?

KLA would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

ASE TechnologyASXvs

KLAKLAC

ASE Technology vs KLA stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

KLA is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	ASE Technology	KLA
	$78.5 billion	$198 billion
	6.2%	35.6%
	−1.3%	+14.4%
	64.5×	41.1×
	1.4 years	0.7 years
	7.9%	38.2%
	0.9%	0.4%

Open ASE Technology Open KLA

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: ASE Technology vs Lam Research · ASE Technology vs Adobe · ASE Technology vs Applied Materials · ASE Technology vs Arista Networks · KLA vs Broadcom · KLA vs Cadence Design Systems · KLA vs Coherent · KLA vs Salesforce