Which is more profitable, ASE Technology or Lam Research?

Lam Research keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, ASE Technology or Lam Research?

Lam Research grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, ASE Technology or Lam Research?

Lam Research costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, ASE Technology or Lam Research?

Lam Research would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

ASE TechnologyASXvs

Lam ResearchLRCX

ASE Technology vs Lam Research stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Lam Research is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	ASE Technology	Lam Research
	$78.5 billion	$282 billion
	6.2%	31.3%
	−1.3%	+9.7%
	64.5×	38.8×
	1.4 years	Net cash
	7.9%	42.1%
	0.9%	0.3%

Open ASE Technology Open Lam Research

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: ASE Technology vs Adobe · ASE Technology vs Applied Materials · ASE Technology vs Arista Networks · ASE Technology vs Cadence Design Systems · Lam Research vs Broadcom · Lam Research vs Cadence Design Systems · Lam Research vs Salesforce · Lam Research vs CrowdStrike Holdings