Adobe vs Cisco stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Adobe | Cisco | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $377 billion | |
| 30.0% | 21.0% | |
| +13.1% | +4.9% | |
| 13.3× | 28.4× | |
| 0.1 years | 1.1 years | |
| 39.9% | 17.7% | |
| – | 1.4% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs Datadog · Adobe vs Fortinet · Adobe vs Corning · Adobe vs IBM · Cisco vs Applied Materials · Cisco vs Arista Networks · Cisco vs Broadcom · Cisco vs Cadence Design Systems

