ASML vs SAP stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
ASML is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. SAP is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| ASML | SAP | |
|---|---|---|
| $576 billion | $271 billion | |
| 29.4% | 19.5% | |
| +15.6% | +7.6% | |
| 54.4× | 34.3× | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 38.9% | 16.7% | |
| 0.5% | 1.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: ASML vs Sandisk · ASML vs TSMC · ASML vs Apple · ASML vs Adobe · SAP vs Broadcom · SAP vs Cadence Design Systems · SAP vs Fortinet · SAP vs Intuit

