Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Amphenol?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Amphenol?

Amphenol grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Amphenol?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Amphenol?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

AmphenolAPH

Applied Materials vs Amphenol stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Amphenol grows faster.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Amphenol
	$294 billion	$193 billion
	24.7%	18.5%
	+10.5%	+21.8%
	42.0×	45.2×
	Net cash	0.6 years
	28.1%	16.7%
	0.4%	0.6%

Open Applied Materials Open Amphenol

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Arm Holdings · Applied Materials vs ASML · Applied Materials vs ASE Technology · Applied Materials vs Broadcom · Amphenol vs Arista Networks · Amphenol vs Broadcom · Amphenol vs Cadence Design Systems · Amphenol vs Fortinet