Which is more profitable, Amphenol or Cadence Design Systems?

Cadence Design Systems keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Amphenol or Cadence Design Systems?

Amphenol grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Amphenol or Cadence Design Systems?

Amphenol costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Amphenol or Cadence Design Systems?

Cadence Design Systems would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AmphenolAPHvs

Cadence Design SystemsCDNS

Amphenol vs Cadence Design Systems stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Amphenol grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Cadence Design Systems is more profitable and has less debt.

Side by side

	Amphenol	Cadence Design Systems
	$193 billion	$88.6 billion
	18.5%	20.9%
	+21.8%	+14.6%
	45.2×	79.9×
	0.6 years	Net cash
	16.7%	16.4%
	0.6%	–

Open Amphenol Open Cadence Design Systems

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Amphenol vs Fortinet · Amphenol vs KLA · Amphenol vs Lam Research · Amphenol vs Microsoft · Cadence Design Systems vs Arm Holdings · Cadence Design Systems vs ASML · Cadence Design Systems vs ASE Technology · Cadence Design Systems vs Broadcom