Stock comparison
Amphenol
Cadence Design Systems
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
APH
Amphenol
Market cap
$162.46B
Sector
Technology
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
Market cap
$103.04B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Cadence Design Systems CDNS
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | APH | CDNS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 71B | 78B | CDNS |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 84A | Tie |
| Philip Fisher | 79B | 84A | CDNS |
| Peter Lynch | 72B | 78B | CDNS |
| Joel Greenblatt | 57C | 58C | CDNS |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 80A | CDNS |
| Terry Smith | 67D | 80A | CDNS |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | APH | CDNS |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $162.46B | $103.04B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.3x | 80.7x |
| EV/EBIT | 28.2x | 59.1x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 13.69% | 12.19% |
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 88.85% |
| Net margin | 17.28% | 21.18% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.71% | 15.38% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 27.46% | 12.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.3x | 0.5x |
| Dividend yield | 0.66% | 0.0% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
APH leads on
- Dividend yield0.66%vs 0.0%+100%
- P/E (TTM)34.3xvs 80.7x+57%
- EPS CAGR 5y27.46%vs 12.65%+54%
- EV/EBIT28.2xvs 59.1x+52%
CDNS leads on
- Debt / Equity0.5xvs 1.3x+65%
- Gross margin88.85%vs 37.35%+58%
- Net margin21.18%vs 17.28%+18%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.