Which is more profitable, Amphenol or KLA?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Amphenol or KLA?

Amphenol grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Amphenol or KLA?

KLA costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Amphenol or KLA?

Amphenol would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AmphenolAPHvs

KLAKLAC

Amphenol vs KLA stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Amphenol grows faster and has less debt. KLA is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Amphenol	KLA
	$193 billion	$198 billion
	18.5%	35.6%
	+21.8%	+14.4%
	45.2×	41.1×
	0.6 years	0.7 years
	16.7%	38.2%
	0.6%	0.4%

Open Amphenol Open KLA

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Amphenol vs Lam Research · Amphenol vs Microsoft · Amphenol vs Nvidia · Amphenol vs TSMC · KLA vs Arm Holdings · KLA vs ASML · KLA vs ASE Technology · KLA vs Broadcom