Stock comparison
Amphenol
KLA
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
APH
Amphenol
Market cap
$162.46B
Sector
Technology
KLAC
KLA
Market cap
$246.68B
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
KLA KLAC
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | APH | KLAC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 71B | 80A | KLAC |
| Benjamin Graham | 84A | 94A | KLAC |
| Philip Fisher | 79B | 90A | KLAC |
| Peter Lynch | 72B | 78B | KLAC |
| Joel Greenblatt | 57C | 78C | KLAC |
| Charlie Munger | 73B | 93A | KLAC |
| Terry Smith | 67D | 94A | KLAC |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | APH | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $162.46B | $246.68B |
| P/E (TTM) | 34.3x | 51.8x |
| EV/EBIT | 28.2x | 46.9x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 13.69% | 36.29% |
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 61.75% |
| Net margin | 17.28% | 35.66% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 20.71% | 15.13% |
| EPS CAGR 5y | 27.46% | 22.65% |
| Debt / Equity | 1.3x | 1.1x |
| Dividend yield | 0.66% | 0.43% |
Where each one wins
The metrics with the biggest gap between the two - sorted so the most decisive edges read first.
APH leads on
- EV/EBIT28.2xvs 46.9x+40%
- Dividend yield0.66%vs 0.43%+35%
- P/E (TTM)34.3xvs 51.8x+34%
- Revenue CAGR 5y20.71%vs 15.13%+27%
KLAC leads on
- ROIC (TTM)36.29%vs 13.69%+62%
- Net margin35.66%vs 17.28%+52%
- Gross margin61.75%vs 37.35%+40%
- Market cap$246.68Bvs $162.46B+34%
Related on invest-like
Key terms in this analysis
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.