Which is more profitable, Analog Devices or Fortinet?

Fortinet keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Analog Devices or Fortinet?

Fortinet grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Analog Devices or Fortinet?

Fortinet costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Analog Devices or Fortinet?

Fortinet would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Analog DevicesADIvs

FortinetFTNT

Analog Devices vs Fortinet stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Fortinet is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Analog Devices	Fortinet
	$193 billion	$93.5 billion
	20.6%	27.3%
	+14.5%	+21.3%
	85.1×	50.4×
	1.2 years	Net cash
	5.8%	83.5%
	1.0%	–

Open Analog Devices Open Fortinet

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Analog Devices vs Intuit · Analog Devices vs KLA · Analog Devices vs Lam Research · Analog Devices vs Microsoft · Fortinet vs Applied Materials · Fortinet vs AMD · Fortinet vs Arista Networks · Fortinet vs Amphenol