Which is more profitable, Analog Devices or KLA?

KLA keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Analog Devices or KLA?

Analog Devices grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Analog Devices or KLA?

KLA costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Analog Devices or KLA?

KLA would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Analog DevicesADIvs

KLAKLAC

Analog Devices vs KLA stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Analog Devices grows faster. KLA is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Analog Devices	KLA
	$193 billion	$198 billion
	20.6%	35.6%
	+14.5%	+14.4%
	85.1×	41.1×
	1.2 years	0.7 years
	5.8%	38.2%
	1.0%	0.4%

Open Analog Devices Open KLA

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Analog Devices vs Lam Research · Analog Devices vs Microsoft · Analog Devices vs Nvidia · Analog Devices vs Palo Alto Networks · KLA vs Applied Materials · KLA vs AMD · KLA vs Arista Networks · KLA vs Amphenol