Which is more profitable, Analog Devices or Palo Alto Networks?

Analog Devices keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Analog Devices or Palo Alto Networks?

Palo Alto Networks grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Analog Devices or Palo Alto Networks?

Analog Devices costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Analog Devices or Palo Alto Networks?

Palo Alto Networks would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Analog DevicesADIvs

Palo Alto NetworksPANW

Analog Devices vs Palo Alto Networks stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Analog Devices is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Palo Alto Networks grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Analog Devices	Palo Alto Networks
	$193 billion	$264 billion
	20.6%	12.3%
	+14.5%	+22.0%
	85.1×	232.7×
	1.2 years	Net cash
	5.8%	15.9%
	1.0%	–

Open Analog Devices Open Palo Alto Networks

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Analog Devices vs TSMC · Analog Devices vs Apple · Analog Devices vs Adobe · Analog Devices vs Applied Materials · Palo Alto Networks vs Applied Materials · Palo Alto Networks vs AMD · Palo Alto Networks vs Arista Networks · Palo Alto Networks vs Arm Holdings