Which is more profitable, Arm Holdings or Palo Alto Networks?

Arm Holdings keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Arm Holdings or Palo Alto Networks?

Arm Holdings grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Arm Holdings or Palo Alto Networks?

Arm Holdings costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Arm Holdings or Palo Alto Networks?

Arm Holdings would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Arm HoldingsARMvs

Palo Alto NetworksPANW

Arm Holdings vs Palo Alto Networks stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Arm Holdings is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.

Side by side

	Arm Holdings	Palo Alto Networks
	$204 billion	$264 billion
	18.4%	12.3%
	+22.5%	+22.0%
	225.5×	232.7×
	Net cash	Net cash
	8.4%	15.9%
	–	–

Open Arm Holdings Open Palo Alto Networks

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Arm Holdings vs TSMC · Arm Holdings vs Apple · Arm Holdings vs Adobe · Arm Holdings vs Applied Materials · Palo Alto Networks vs Broadcom · Palo Alto Networks vs Cadence Design Systems · Palo Alto Networks vs Dell Technologies · Palo Alto Networks vs Fortinet