Which is more profitable, Adobe or Analog Devices?

Adobe keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Adobe or Analog Devices?

Analog Devices grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Adobe or Analog Devices?

Adobe costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Adobe or Analog Devices?

Adobe would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AdobeADBEvs

Analog DevicesADI

Adobe vs Analog Devices stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Adobe is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Analog Devices grows faster.

Side by side

	Adobe	Analog Devices
	$94.6 billion	$193 billion
	30.0%	20.6%
	+13.1%	+14.5%
	13.3×	85.1×
	0.1 years	1.2 years
	39.9%	5.8%
	–	1.0%

Open Adobe Open Analog Devices

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Adobe vs Applied Materials · Adobe vs AMD · Adobe vs Arista Networks · Adobe vs Amphenol · Analog Devices vs Applied Materials · Analog Devices vs Arista Networks · Analog Devices vs Broadcom · Analog Devices vs Cadence Design Systems