Which is more profitable, Adobe or Amphenol?

Adobe keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Adobe or Amphenol?

Amphenol grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Adobe or Amphenol?

Adobe costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Adobe or Amphenol?

Adobe would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AdobeADBEvs

AmphenolAPH

Adobe vs Amphenol stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Adobe is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Amphenol grows faster.

Side by side

	Adobe	Amphenol
	$94.6 billion	$193 billion
	30.0%	18.5%
	+13.1%	+21.8%
	13.3×	45.2×
	0.1 years	0.6 years
	39.9%	16.7%
	–	0.6%

Open Adobe Open Amphenol

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Adobe vs Arm Holdings · Adobe vs ASML · Adobe vs ASE Technology · Adobe vs Broadcom · Amphenol vs Applied Materials · Amphenol vs Arista Networks · Amphenol vs Broadcom · Amphenol vs Cadence Design Systems