Adobe vs AMD stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. AMD grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Adobe | AMD | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $876 billion | |
| 30.0% | 12.5% | |
| +13.1% | +28.8% | |
| 13.3× | 202.1× | |
| 0.1 years | Net cash | |
| 39.9% | 5.2% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs Arista Networks · Adobe vs Amphenol · Adobe vs Arm Holdings · Adobe vs ASML · AMD vs Applied Materials · AMD vs Arista Networks · AMD vs Broadcom · AMD vs Cadence Design Systems

