AMD vs Cadence Design Systems stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
AMD grows faster and has less debt. Cadence Design Systems is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| AMD | Cadence Design Systems | |
|---|---|---|
| $876 billion | $88.6 billion | |
| 12.5% | 20.9% | |
| +28.8% | +14.6% | |
| 202.1× | 79.9× | |
| Net cash | Net cash | |
| 5.2% | 16.4% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: AMD vs Fortinet · AMD vs Intel · AMD vs Intuit · AMD vs KLA · Cadence Design Systems vs Arista Networks · Cadence Design Systems vs Amphenol · Cadence Design Systems vs Arm Holdings · Cadence Design Systems vs ASML

