Which is more profitable, Adobe or Monolithic Power Systems?

Adobe keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Adobe or Monolithic Power Systems?

Monolithic Power Systems grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Adobe or Monolithic Power Systems?

Adobe costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Adobe or Monolithic Power Systems?

Monolithic Power Systems would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

AdobeADBEvs

Monolithic Power SystemsMPWR

Adobe vs Monolithic Power Systems stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Adobe is more profitable and is cheaper for its profits. Monolithic Power Systems grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Adobe	Monolithic Power Systems
	$94.6 billion	$67.8 billion
	30.0%	22.3%
	+13.1%	+27.0%
	13.3×	109.1×
	0.1 years	Net cash
	39.9%	16.6%
	–	0.4%

Open Adobe Open Monolithic Power Systems

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Adobe vs Marvell Technology · Adobe vs Microsoft · Adobe vs Motorola Solutions · Adobe vs Strategy · Monolithic Power Systems vs Applied Materials · Monolithic Power Systems vs Arista Networks · Monolithic Power Systems vs Broadcom · Monolithic Power Systems vs Cadence Design Systems