Adobe vs Marvell Technology stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Marvell Technology is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| Adobe | Marvell Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $141 billion | |
| 30.0% | 32.6% | |
| +13.1% | +22.5% | |
| 13.3× | 52.8× | |
| 0.1 years | 0.5 years | |
| 39.9% | 13.8% | |
| – | 0.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs Microsoft · Adobe vs Motorola Solutions · Adobe vs Strategy · Adobe vs Micron Technology · Marvell Technology vs Applied Materials · Marvell Technology vs Arista Networks · Marvell Technology vs Broadcom · Marvell Technology vs Cadence Design Systems