Cadence Design Systems vs Marvell Technology stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Cadence Design Systems has less debt. Marvell Technology is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Cadence Design Systems | Marvell Technology | |
|---|---|---|
| $88.6 billion | $141 billion | |
| 20.9% | 32.6% | |
| +14.6% | +22.5% | |
| 79.9× | 52.8× | |
| Net cash | 0.5 years | |
| 16.4% | 13.8% | |
| – | 0.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Cadence Design Systems vs Microsoft · Cadence Design Systems vs Motorola Solutions · Cadence Design Systems vs Strategy · Cadence Design Systems vs Micron Technology · Marvell Technology vs Fortinet · Marvell Technology vs KLA · Marvell Technology vs Lam Research · Marvell Technology vs Microsoft

