Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Marvell Technology?

Marvell Technology keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Marvell Technology?

Marvell Technology grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Marvell Technology?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Marvell Technology?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

Marvell TechnologyMRVL

Applied Materials vs Marvell Technology stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Marvell Technology is more profitable and grows faster.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Marvell Technology
	$294 billion	$141 billion
	24.7%	32.6%
	+10.5%	+22.5%
	42.0×	52.8×
	Net cash	0.5 years
	28.1%	13.8%
	0.4%	0.1%

Open Applied Materials Open Marvell Technology

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Microsoft · Applied Materials vs Motorola Solutions · Applied Materials vs Strategy · Applied Materials vs Micron Technology · Marvell Technology vs Arista Networks · Marvell Technology vs Broadcom · Marvell Technology vs Cadence Design Systems · Marvell Technology vs Fortinet