Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Motorola Solutions?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Motorola Solutions?

Applied Materials grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Motorola Solutions?

Motorola Solutions costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Motorola Solutions?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

Motorola SolutionsMSI

Applied Materials vs Motorola Solutions stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Motorola Solutions is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Motorola Solutions
	$294 billion	$87.8 billion
	24.7%	18.4%
	+10.5%	+9.5%
	42.0×	40.8×
	Net cash	2.4 years
	28.1%	21.1%
	0.4%	1.2%

Open Applied Materials Open Motorola Solutions

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Strategy · Applied Materials vs Micron Technology · Applied Materials vs Cloudflare · Applied Materials vs ServiceNow · Motorola Solutions vs Arista Networks · Motorola Solutions vs Broadcom · Motorola Solutions vs Cadence Design Systems · Motorola Solutions vs Fortinet