Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Strategy?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Strategy?

Applied Materials grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Strategy?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Strategy?

We don't have the number for both companies.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

StrategyMSTR

Applied Materials vs Strategy stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Strategy
	$294 billion	$47.2 billion
	24.7%	-806.3%
	+10.5%	−0.1%
	42.0×	No profit yet
	Net cash	–
	28.1%	-7.5%
	0.4%	–

Open Applied Materials Open Strategy

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs Micron Technology · Applied Materials vs Cloudflare · Applied Materials vs ServiceNow · Applied Materials vs Nvidia · Strategy vs Arista Networks · Strategy vs Broadcom · Strategy vs American Express · Strategy vs Cadence Design Systems