Which is more profitable, Applied Materials or Cloudflare?

Applied Materials keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Applied Materials or Cloudflare?

Cloudflare grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Applied Materials or Cloudflare?

Applied Materials costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Applied Materials or Cloudflare?

Applied Materials would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Applied MaterialsAMATvs

CloudflareNET

Applied Materials vs Cloudflare stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Applied Materials is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Cloudflare grows faster.

Side by side

	Applied Materials	Cloudflare
	$294 billion	$110 billion
	24.7%	-4.7%
	+10.5%	+38.1%
	42.0×	No profit yet
	Net cash	24.3 years
	28.1%	-1.4%
	0.4%	–

Open Applied Materials Open Cloudflare

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Applied Materials vs ServiceNow · Applied Materials vs Nvidia · Applied Materials vs NXP Semiconductors · Applied Materials vs Oracle · Cloudflare vs Arista Networks · Cloudflare vs Broadcom · Cloudflare vs Cadence Design Systems · Cloudflare vs Fortinet