Stock comparison
Applied MaterialsvsMicrosoft
Scored across Buffett, Graham, Lynch and Greenblatt - plus a side-by-side metric table covering valuation, quality, growth and balance sheet.
AMAT
Applied Materials
Market cap
$253.96B
Sector
Technology
MSFT
Microsoft
Market cap
$3.4T
Sector
Technology
Overall winner
Applied Materials AMAT
Wins on the combined sum of fit scores across all four strategies. Per-strategy breakdown below.
Fit scores by strategy
| Strategy | AMAT | MSFT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warren Buffett | 59C | 56C | AMAT |
| Benjamin Graham | 62C | 46D | AMAT |
| Peter Lynch |
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AMAT | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $253.96B | $3.4T |
| P/E (TTM) | 37.5x | 26.5x |
| EV/EBIT | 19.3x | 23.3x |
| ROIC (TTM) | 21.96% | 22.02% |
| Gross margin | 48.67% | 68.76% |
| Net margin | 24.67% | 35.71% |
| Revenue CAGR 5y | 10.02% |
Per-strategy fit reports
Warren Buffett
Benjamin Graham
Peter Lynch
Joel Greenblatt
Related
Educational tool. Fit scores are deterministic projections from public financials onto each investor's published criteria - not personal recommendations or advice.