Adobe vs Cloudflare stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Cloudflare grows faster.
Side by side
| Adobe | Cloudflare | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $110 billion | |
| 30.0% | -4.7% | |
| +13.1% | +38.1% | |
| 13.3× | No profit yet | |
| 0.1 years | 24.3 years | |
| 39.9% | -1.4% | |
| – | – |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs ServiceNow · Adobe vs Nvidia · Adobe vs NXP Semiconductors · Adobe vs Oracle · Cloudflare vs Applied Materials · Cloudflare vs Arista Networks · Cloudflare vs Broadcom · Cloudflare vs Cadence Design Systems