Adobe vs Western Digital stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Adobe grows faster. Western Digital is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Adobe | Western Digital | |
|---|---|---|
| $94.6 billion | $111 billion | |
| 30.0% | 72.9% | |
| +13.1% | −5.3% | |
| 13.3× | 11.7× | |
| 0.1 years | Net cash | |
| 39.9% | 82.3% | |
| – | 0.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Adobe vs Apple · Adobe vs Accenture · Adobe vs Analog Devices · Adobe vs Applied Materials · Western Digital vs Applied Materials · Western Digital vs Arista Networks · Western Digital vs Broadcom · Western Digital vs Cadence Design Systems

