Automatic Data Processing vs Eaton stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Automatic Data Processing is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Eaton grows faster.
Side by side
| Automatic Data Processing | Eaton | |
|---|---|---|
| $122 billion | $137 billion | |
| 20.1% | 14.9% | |
| +7.9% | +9.0% | |
| 27.7× | 33.6× | |
| 0.2 years | 1.6 years | |
| 44.4% | 14.0% | |
| 2.9% | 1.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Automatic Data Processing vs Fastenal · Automatic Data Processing vs General Electric · Automatic Data Processing vs General Dynamics · Automatic Data Processing vs GE Aerospace · Eaton vs Ametek · Eaton vs Caterpillar · Eaton vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City · Eaton vs Cintas

