Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Eaton stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Canadian Pacific Kansas City is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Eaton has less debt.
Side by side
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City | Eaton | |
|---|---|---|
| $81.9 billion | $137 billion | |
| 27.5% | 14.9% | |
| +19.6% | +9.0% | |
| 28.2× | 33.6× | |
| 2.8 years | 1.6 years | |
| 7.4% | 14.0% | |
| 0.7% | 1.1% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Fastenal · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs General Dynamics · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs W.W. Grainger · Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs Honeywell International · Eaton vs Cintas · Eaton vs Curtiss-Wright · Eaton vs Fastenal · Eaton vs General Electric