The Allstate vs Moody's stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
The Allstate grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Moody's is more profitable.
Side by side
| The Allstate | Moody's | |
|---|---|---|
| $66.2 billion | $87.6 billion | |
| 15.3% | 31.9% | |
| +9.9% | +7.5% | |
| 6.4× | 35.6× | |
| 0.5 years | 1.3 years | |
| 28.8% | 24.2% | |
| 1.9% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: The Allstate vs S&P Global · The Allstate vs Visa · The Allstate vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · The Allstate vs JPMorgan Chase · Moody's vs Aon · Moody's vs Apollo Global Management · Moody's vs American Express · Moody's vs Bank of America

