The Allstate vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
The Allstate is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. S&P Global is more profitable and grows faster.
Side by side
| The Allstate | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $66.2 billion | $137 billion | |
| 15.3% | 29.2% | |
| +9.9% | +15.6% | |
| 6.4× | 30.7× | |
| 0.5 years | 1.5 years | |
| 28.8% | 11.8% | |
| 1.9% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: The Allstate vs Visa · The Allstate vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · The Allstate vs JPMorgan Chase · The Allstate vs Mastercard · S&P Global vs Aon · S&P Global vs Apollo Global Management · S&P Global vs American Express · S&P Global vs Bank of America

