Aon vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Aon is cheaper for its profits. S&P Global is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Aon | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $71.8 billion | $137 billion | |
| 21.5% | 29.2% | |
| +9.2% | +15.6% | |
| 19.4× | 30.7× | |
| 2.3 years | 1.5 years | |
| 17.8% | 11.8% | |
| 1.0% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Aon vs Visa · Aon vs Arthur J. Gallagher & · Aon vs Mastercard · Aon vs Moody's · S&P Global vs Apollo Global Management · S&P Global vs American Express · S&P Global vs Bank of America · S&P Global vs Brookfield Asset Management

