Arthur J. Gallagher & vs Aon stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Arthur J. Gallagher & grows faster. Aon is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Arthur J. Gallagher & | Aon | |
|---|---|---|
| $72.6 billion | $71.8 billion | |
| 10.7% | 21.5% | |
| +14.8% | +9.2% | |
| 48.6× | 19.4× | |
| 3.3 years | 2.3 years | |
| 5.5% | 17.8% | |
| 1.3% | 1.0% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Arthur J. Gallagher & vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Arthur J. Gallagher & vs Mastercard · Arthur J. Gallagher & vs Marsh & McLennan Companies · Aon vs Mastercard · Aon vs Moody's · Aon vs Marsh & McLennan Companies · Aon vs S&P Global