Arthur J. Gallagher & vs Marsh & McLennan Companies stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Arthur J. Gallagher & grows faster. Marsh & McLennan Companies is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Arthur J. Gallagher & | Marsh & McLennan Companies | |
|---|---|---|
| $72.6 billion | $98.8 billion | |
| 10.7% | 15.4% | |
| +14.8% | +9.4% | |
| 48.6× | 23.8× | |
| 3.3 years | 2.5 years | |
| 5.5% | 14.4% | |
| 1.3% | 2.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Arthur J. Gallagher & vs Aon · Arthur J. Gallagher & vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Arthur J. Gallagher & vs Mastercard · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Aon · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Chubb · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Mastercard