Which is more profitable, Mastercard or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Mastercard keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Mastercard or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Mastercard grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Mastercard or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Marsh & McLennan Companies costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Mastercard or Marsh & McLennan Companies?

Mastercard would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

MastercardMAvs

Marsh & McLennan CompaniesMRSH

Mastercard vs Marsh & McLennan Companies stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Mastercard is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Marsh & McLennan Companies is cheaper for its profits.

Side by side

	Mastercard	Marsh & McLennan Companies
	$576 billion	$98.8 billion
	45.6%	15.4%
	+16.5%	+9.4%
	38.5×	23.8×
	0.4 years	2.5 years
	58.5%	14.4%
	0.7%	2.3%

Open Mastercard Open Marsh & McLennan Companies

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Mastercard vs Morgan Stanley · Mastercard vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group · Mastercard vs Nasdaq · Mastercard vs Nu Holdings · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Moody's · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs S&P Global · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Visa · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Arthur J. Gallagher &