Which is more profitable, Marsh & McLennan Companies or Visa?

Visa keeps more of every sale as profit.

Which grows faster, Marsh & McLennan Companies or Visa?

Visa grew its sales faster in recent years.

Which is cheaper, Marsh & McLennan Companies or Visa?

Marsh & McLennan Companies costs less for each unit of yearly profit (lower P/E).

Which has less debt, Marsh & McLennan Companies or Visa?

Visa would need fewer years of earnings to pay off its debt.

Marsh & McLennan CompaniesMRSHvs

VisaV

Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Visa stock

Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.

In one sentence

Marsh & McLennan Companies is cheaper for its profits. Visa is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.

Side by side

	Marsh & McLennan Companies	Visa
	$98.8 billion	$794 billion
	15.4%	51.2%
	+9.4%	+13.7%
	23.8×	33.8×
	2.5 years	0.3 years
	14.4%	31.8%
	2.3%	0.8%

Open Marsh & McLennan Companies Open Visa

How we compare

Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.

More comparisons: Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Arthur J. Gallagher & · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Aon · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs Chubb · Marsh & McLennan Companies vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Visa vs Morgan Stanley · Visa vs Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group · Visa vs Nasdaq · Visa vs Nu Holdings