Nasdaq vs Visa stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Nasdaq is cheaper for its profits. Visa is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt.
Side by side
| Nasdaq | Visa | |
|---|---|---|
| $60.2 billion | $794 billion | |
| 21.6% | 51.2% | |
| +8.0% | +13.7% | |
| 33.7× | 33.8× | |
| 2.9 years | 0.3 years | |
| 7.3% | 31.8% | |
| 1.2% | 0.8% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Nasdaq vs Chubb · Nasdaq vs CME Group · Nasdaq vs Intercontinental Exchange · Nasdaq vs JPMorgan Chase · Visa vs Nu Holdings · Visa vs NatWest Group · Visa vs The Progressive · Visa vs The PNC Financial Services Group

