Intercontinental Exchange vs Nasdaq stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Intercontinental Exchange is more profitable, grows faster and is cheaper for its profits. Nasdaq has less debt.
Side by side
| Intercontinental Exchange | Nasdaq | |
|---|---|---|
| $99.8 billion | $60.2 billion | |
| 26.2% | 21.6% | |
| +8.9% | +8.0% | |
| 30.1× | 33.7× | |
| 2.9 years | 2.9 years | |
| 8.5% | 7.3% | |
| 1.3% | 1.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Intercontinental Exchange vs S&P Global · Intercontinental Exchange vs Visa · Intercontinental Exchange vs CME Group · Intercontinental Exchange vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Nasdaq vs JPMorgan Chase · Nasdaq vs Mastercard · Nasdaq vs Moody's · Nasdaq vs S&P Global

