CME Group vs Intercontinental Exchange stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
CME Group is more profitable, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt. Intercontinental Exchange grows faster.
Side by side
| CME Group | Intercontinental Exchange | |
|---|---|---|
| $114 billion | $99.8 billion | |
| 62.5% | 26.2% | |
| +6.0% | +8.9% | |
| 27.9× | 30.1× | |
| Net cash | 2.9 years | |
| 13.9% | 8.5% | |
| 4.0% | 1.3% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: CME Group vs JPMorgan Chase · CME Group vs Mastercard · CME Group vs Moody's · CME Group vs Nasdaq · Intercontinental Exchange vs i BBCA ID SDR 1to2 · Intercontinental Exchange vs Mastercard · Intercontinental Exchange vs Moody's · Intercontinental Exchange vs Nasdaq

