Mastercard vs Nasdaq stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
Mastercard is more profitable, grows faster and has less debt. Nasdaq is cheaper for its profits.
Side by side
| Mastercard | Nasdaq | |
|---|---|---|
| $576 billion | $60.2 billion | |
| 45.6% | 21.6% | |
| +16.5% | +8.0% | |
| 38.5× | 33.7× | |
| 0.4 years | 2.9 years | |
| 58.5% | 7.3% | |
| 0.7% | 1.2% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Mastercard vs Nu Holdings · Mastercard vs NatWest Group · Mastercard vs The Progressive · Mastercard vs The PNC Financial Services Group · Nasdaq vs Moody's · Nasdaq vs S&P Global · Nasdaq vs Visa · Nasdaq vs Chubb

