Nasdaq vs S&P Global stock
Side by side in plain words: who keeps more of its sales, grows faster, costs less and owes less.
S&P Global is more profitable, grows faster, is cheaper for its profits and has less debt.
Side by side
| Nasdaq | S&P Global | |
|---|---|---|
| $60.2 billion | $137 billion | |
| 21.6% | 29.2% | |
| +8.0% | +15.6% | |
| 33.7× | 30.7× | |
| 2.9 years | 1.5 years | |
| 7.3% | 11.8% | |
| 1.2% | 0.9% |
How we compare
Four contests with the same rules as each stock page: profit kept from sales (higher wins), yearly sales growth across the last reports, up to five years (higher wins), price per unit of yearly profit (lower P/E wins; a company without profit loses) and debt in years of earnings (lower wins). A winner is only named when both companies have the number.
More comparisons: Nasdaq vs Visa · Nasdaq vs Chubb · Nasdaq vs CME Group · Nasdaq vs Intercontinental Exchange · S&P Global vs Nu Holdings · S&P Global vs NatWest Group · S&P Global vs The Progressive · S&P Global vs The PNC Financial Services Group

